Founder summary
Speed, owner clarity, customer trust and what must happen next.
🇺🇸 USA / Israel
Wiz
Wiz is compelling when cloud is the business and cloud risk is the board conversation. It finds the paths, exposures and priorities that generic tools miss. The trade-off is focus and budget: it is a cloud-security specialist, not a cheap all-in-one operating layer for a small team starting from zero.
Starting price
Custom quote
Custom quote
Wiz pricing is modular and quote-led; workloads, developers, log ingestion, sensors and SMB bundles can all change scope.
Official site Verified 2026-05-19
Open rating
Overall score: 64/100
Score basis: Weighted editorial score across eight visible dimensions: compliance readiness, evidence completeness, operational coverage, remediation workflow, SMB practicality, price clarity, data control and regional fit.
ConfidenceMedium confidence
Last reviewed2026-05-19
Citable rating summary
- Overall score: 64/100
- Confidence: Medium confidence
- Last reviewed: 2026-05-19
- Public rating dataset: /data/ratings.json
- Best fit: Cloud-heavy companies that need deep cloud risk visibility and have budget for a serious CNAPP
- Caveats: Not enough when the team needs hands-on technical remediation, endpoint/cloud/AppSec protection or backup proof inside the same workflow.
Use the vendor page and public dataset together. Do not cite the score without confidence, last-reviewed date and caveats.
Buyer mode
Neutral: Neutral buyer view: compare Wiz by score, fit, gaps, evidence sources, pricing caveats and where it is not enough before choosing a stack.
Compliance Readiness72/100
Public docs/ Medium confidenceEditorial inference/ Medium confidence
Evidence Completeness65/100
Public docs/ Medium confidenceEditorial inference/ Medium confidence
Operational Coverage80/100
Public docs/ Medium confidenceEditorial inference/ Medium confidence
Remediation Workflow70/100
Public docs/ Medium confidenceEditorial inference/ Medium confidence
SMB Practicality50/100
Public docs/ Medium confidenceEditorial inference/ Medium confidence
Price / TCO clarity35/100
Vendor statement/ Medium confidenceEditorial inference/ Medium confidence
Data Control / BYOK60/100
Public docs/ Medium confidenceEditorial inference/ Medium confidence
Regional Fit80/100
Public docs/ Medium confidenceEditorial inference/ Medium confidence
Best fit
- Cloud-heavy companies that need deep cloud risk visibility and have budget for a serious CNAPP
Known gaps
- Excellent cloud depth, but expensive and not an all-in-one SMB security workflow
- Wiz pricing is modular and quote-led; workloads, developers, log ingestion, sensors and SMB bundles can all change scope.
Not enough for
- Not enough when the team needs hands-on technical remediation, endpoint/cloud/AppSec protection or backup proof inside the same workflow.
Evidence sources
Editorial inference/ Medium confidenceVendor statement/ Medium confidencePublic docs/ Medium confidence
Rating is directional. No tool purchase creates compliance. Use this rating as buyer guidance, then verify legal scope, implementation evidence and current vendor terms directly.
Boardroom briefs
Boardroom briefs
CFO summary
Subscription cost, quote risk, hidden owner time and audit surprises.
Auditor summary
Evidence freshness, traceability, owners, review cadence and caveats.
Security lead summary
Coverage gaps, integrations, remediation ownership and operational risk.
When not to buy
Negative-fit check
Use this section before a sales call. It is designed to reduce overbuying and false confidence, not to crown a default winner.
Do not buy this if
- Do not buy this if the team needs hands-on endpoint, cloud, AppSec or backup protection inside the same workflow.
- Do not buy this if procurement requires independently published pricing and scope before a sales or vendor conversation.
Buy this only if
- Buy this only if the strongest fit is really: Cloud-heavy companies that need deep cloud risk visibility and have budget for a serious CNAPP.
- Buy this only if someone owns configuration, evidence capture, renewal review and follow-through after the purchase.
Pair it with
- Pair it with protection tools and remediation ownership when the program needs more than GRC evidence and policy workflows.
Replace it when
- Replace it when the tool no longer matches the main risk, the renewal cost outruns value or evidence remains manual despite the spend.
Badge snippets
Embeddable badges
These badges show that a vendor page was reviewed in Security Stack Compare. They are not certification, endorsement or proof of compliance.
Not certification
Compared
This vendor is listed in the Security Stack Compare buyer guide with visible scores, gaps and source notes.
Not certification
Evidence workflow reviewed
This review includes evidence workflow, receipt types, remediation ownership and audit-readiness caveats.
Not certification
Pricing transparency reviewed
This review includes public pricing signals, quote requirements, hidden-cost risk and verification caveats.
Not certification
SMB fit reviewed
This review includes SMB practicality, fit by company size, operational gaps and when the tool is not enough.
Capabilities
endpointNot includedmdrNot includedvulnImplementedcloudStrongcodePartialbackupNot includedidentityImplementedsupplierNot includedcontractNot includedevidencePartialremediationPartialexecReportsImplementedbyokPartial
Best compliance fit
ISO 27001SOC 2HIPAAPCI DSS
Main gap
Excellent cloud depth, but expensive and not an all-in-one SMB security workflow
How we know
Wiz pricing is modular and custom-quote, scaling by workloads, developers, log ingestion or sensors; verify scope and minimums directly.
When to pair it
Wiz is strongest in its core category. If the goal is audit-ready evidence, supplier risk, backup proof or cross-tool remediation, pair it with a separate evidence workflow rather than expecting this tool to cover the whole compliance program.
Evidence, remediation and reporting layer when this tool needs to support audits.
Endpoint and identity signal.
Cloud posture signal.
Endpoint detection and response.